SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Muk's | PiP Window
Chrome extension·by ilham.muktiaji
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
CAUTION
Mostly fine, but a few things worth reviewing before you install.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Muk's | PiP Window's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
32%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 369,936 extensions
In Productivity
42%of productivity extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 177,133 productivity extensions
Findings
11
median 16Lower is safer
Critical findings
1
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
3
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
3
median 14vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 11 distinct issues across 6 severities
11
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical19%
High218%
Needs Review00%
Medium764%
Low19%
Info00%
Permissions requested
3 permissions declared
No risky permissions
3 permissions requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Access current tab
Can temporarily access the content of the active tab when you click the extension
Medium
Block requests with host access
Can block or redirect network requests and requires host permissions
Low
Block network requests (declarative)
Can block or redirect network requests using predefined rules without seeing content
Are you the author of Muk's | PiP Window?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Muk's | PiP Window's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 13, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.