SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Random Wikipedia Articles (Polyglot)
Chrome extension·by vcotta
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
EXCELLENT
Looks clean. No meaningful risks detected in this scan.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Random Wikipedia Articles (Polyglot)'s safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
74%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 369,936 extensions
In Productivity
87%of productivity extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 177,133 productivity extensions
Findings
5
median 16Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
1
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
17
median 14vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 5 distinct issues across 6 severities
5
distinct issues
detected
detected
Scanners reported 10 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.
Critical00%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium360%
Low240%
Info00%
Permissions requested
1 permission declared
No risky permissions
1 permission requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Are you the author of Random Wikipedia Articles (Polyglot)?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Random Wikipedia Articles (Polyglot)'s live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 3, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.