TidyTalk: search ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini chats extension
Security at a glance
Automated estimate from our latest scan (malware, permissions, obfuscation) — not a security audit. Higher safety score is better.
See the full security reportChrome listing ID: clkclodccjconjjmgkgojdicieonegdm
Permissions (6)
- Store local data
- Unlimited local storage
- Use side panel
Related extensions
TidyChatProductivity
Tidy — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok ManagerProductivity
Tidy Folders – Folders & Text Highlights for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & moreProductivity
TidyChats: ChatGPT Folders, Search & Export + Claude, Gemini, GrokProductivity
Tidy AI: Folders for ChatGPT, Claude & GeminiProductivity
TidyThread: Auto-Save, Folders & Search for ChatGPT, Claude & GeminiProductivity
Frequently asked questions
Is TidyTalk: search ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini chats safe to use?
Our latest automated scan rates the Chrome listing of TidyTalk: search ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini chats at 71/100 (some risk) — malware, permission and obfuscation checks combined. The full report lists every finding behind the number. This is an automated estimate, not a guarantee of safety.
What permissions does TidyTalk: search ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini chats require?
TidyTalk: search ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini chats requests 6 permissions. The most significant: Store local data, Unlimited local storage, Use side panel. See the full breakdown in the security report.
Who develops TidyTalk: search ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini chats?
TidyTalk: search ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini chats is published by TidyTalk. Impersonators copy popular extension names, so always verify the developer line and listing id on the store page before installing.
What this assessment covers
- Store listing
- Chrome
- Checked version
- 1.0.0
- Current listed version
- 1.0.0
- Scan date (UTC)
- Assessment status
- Completed
Recorded findings: 0 critical and 19 high severity. Read the finding details before interpreting the score; automated flags are not proof of malicious behaviour.
Automated analysis looks for suspicious code, permissions and other risk signals. It does not observe every runtime behaviour or independently audit the publisher’s servers. A low-risk result is not a guarantee of safety. How our checks work.