TidyThread: Auto-Save, Folders & Search for ChatGPT, Claude & Gemini extension
Security at a glance
Automated estimate from our latest scan (malware, permissions, obfuscation) — not a security audit. Higher safety score is better.
See the full security reportChrome listing ID: niclabgnfdecaonfgohllbggpmdcmipb
Permissions (6)
- Manage downloads
Related extensions
Save ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude Chats - AI chat saverProductivity
Tidy Folders – Folders & Text Highlights for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & moreProductivity
TidyChats: ChatGPT Folders, Search & Export + Claude, Gemini, GrokProductivity
Tidy AI: Folders for ChatGPT, Claude & GeminiProductivity
TidyTalk: search ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini chatsProductivity
ThreadKeep: ChatGPT, Claude & Gemini FoldersProductivity
Frequently asked questions
Is TidyThread: Auto-Save, Folders & Search for ChatGPT, Claude & Gemini safe to use?
Our latest automated scan rates the Chrome listing of TidyThread: Auto-Save, Folders & Search for ChatGPT, Claude & Gemini at 85/100 (some risk) — malware, permission and obfuscation checks combined. The full report lists every finding behind the number. This is an automated estimate, not a guarantee of safety.
What permissions does TidyThread: Auto-Save, Folders & Search for ChatGPT, Claude & Gemini require?
TidyThread: Auto-Save, Folders & Search for ChatGPT, Claude & Gemini requests 6 permissions. The most significant: Manage downloads. See the full breakdown in the security report.
Who develops TidyThread: Auto-Save, Folders & Search for ChatGPT, Claude & Gemini?
TidyThread: Auto-Save, Folders & Search for ChatGPT, Claude & Gemini is published by Komos. Impersonators copy popular extension names, so always verify the developer line and listing id on the store page before installing.
What this assessment covers
- Store listing
- Chrome
- Checked version
- 0.7.1
- Current listed version
- 0.7.1
- Scan date (UTC)
- Assessment status
- Completed
Recorded findings: 0 critical and 2 high severity. Read the finding details before interpreting the score; automated flags are not proof of malicious behaviour.
Automated analysis looks for suspicious code, permissions and other risk signals. It does not observe every runtime behaviour or independently audit the publisher’s servers. A low-risk result is not a guarantee of safety. How our checks work.