SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Random Wikipedia Article
Chrome extension·by yigitaybuga
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
CAUTION
Mostly fine, but a few things worth reviewing before you install.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Random Wikipedia Article's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
24%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 120,711 extensions
In Productivity
49%of productivity extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 25,973 productivity extensions
Findings
11
median 10Lower is safer
Critical findings
1
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
1
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
31
median 23vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 11 findings across 5 severities
11
findings
detected
detected
Critical19%
High00%
Medium982%
Low19%
Info00%
Permissions requested
1 permission declared
No risky permissions
1 permission requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Are you the author of Random Wikipedia Article?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Jun 25, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.