SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Tril
Firefox extension·by Nick Gottschlich
49
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 2 years
- The developer's website is no longer reachable
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Tril's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
24%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 415,885 extensions
In Games Entertainment
12%of games entertainment extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 9,626 games entertainment extensions
Findings
15
median 7Lower is safer
Critical findings
1
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
3
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
0
median 4vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 15 distinct issues across 6 severities
15
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical17%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium1173%
Low320%
Info00%
Permissions requested
3 permissions declared
No risky permissions
3 permissions requested — none are flagged as risky.
Info
http://www.twitter.com/
No additional information available.
Info
http://*.twitter.com/*
No additional information available.
Info
https://*.twitter.com/*
No additional information available.
Are you the author of Tril?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Tril's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Oct 22, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.