SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Tril
Firefox extension·by Nick Gottschlich
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 2 years
- The developer's website is no longer reachable
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Tril's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
52.75%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked across every extension we scan
In its category
42.75%of its category extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked within its category
Findings
1
median 38Lower is safer
Risky permissions
0
median 1Critical + high perms
Total permissions
3
median 4All declared perms
Critical findings
1
median 2Severity = Critical
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 1 distinct issue across 6 severities
1
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical1100%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium00%
Low00%
Info00%
Permissions requested
3 permissions declared
No risky permissions
3 permissions requested — none are flagged as risky.
Info
http://www.twitter.com/
No additional information available.
Info
http://*.twitter.com/*
No additional information available.
Info
https://*.twitter.com/*
No additional information available.
Are you the author of Tril?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Tril's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Jul 25, 2026· partial run (some scanners failed)
Browser extensions made transparent.