SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Royal Flush
Firefox extension·by J A
How it ranks
Royal Flush's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
99%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked across every extension we scan
In its category
90%of its category extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked within its category
Findings
0
median 38Lower is safer
Risky permissions
0
median 1Critical + high perms
Total permissions
4
median 4All declared perms
Critical findings
0
median 2Severity = Critical
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 0 findings across 5 severities
0
findings
detected
detected
Critical00%
High00%
Medium00%
Low00%
Info00%
Permissions requested
4 permissions declared
No risky permissions
4 permissions requested — none are flagged as risky.
Info
*://*.abc.net.au/*
No additional information available.
Info
*://*.bbc.com/*
No additional information available.
Info
*://*.bbc.co.uk/*
No additional information available.
Info
*://*.dailymail.co.uk/*
No additional information available.
Are you the author of Royal Flush?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Jun 25, 2026· partial run (some scanners failed)
Browser extensions made transparent.