SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
QA Sidekick
Edge extension·by QA Sidekick
46
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 4 years
- The developer's website is no longer reachable
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
QA Sidekick's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
28%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 409,539 extensions
In Developer Tools
49%of developer tools extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 3,713 developer tools extensions
Findings
23
median 16Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 1Severity = Critical
Permissions
1
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
60
median 44vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 23 distinct issues across 6 severities
23
distinct issues
detected
detected
Scanners reported 48 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.
Critical00%
High29%
Needs Review00%
Medium1565%
Low626%
Info00%
Permissions requested
1 permission declared
No risky permissions
1 permission requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Are you the author of QA Sidekick?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show QA Sidekick's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Sep 14, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.