Pixel & Tag Checker: GA4, GTM, Meta Audit – The Growth Folks® extension
Security at a glance
Automated estimate from our latest scan (malware, permissions, obfuscation) — not a security audit. Higher safety score is better.
See the full security reportChrome listing ID: gkhajcnfpapiifpabegdmceammcaifkc
Permissions (10)
- Execute scripts in pages
- Observe web requests
- Access browser cookies
Related extensions
TrackPro – Tag & Pixel Checker for GTM, GA4, Meta, TikTokProductivity
Pixel AuditorTools
Tag Inspector — Meta Pixel, LinkedIn & GA4 Tag DetectorProductivity
Pixel Debugger – Meta, TikTok, GA4 & Google AdsProductivity
Pixel Helper & Tag Inspector by Conversion BridgeProductivity
Tagproof – Pixel Helper for Meta, TikTok & Google AdsProductivity
Frequently asked questions
Is Pixel & Tag Checker: GA4, GTM, Meta Audit – The Growth Folks® safe to use?
Our latest automated scan rates the Chrome listing of Pixel & Tag Checker: GA4, GTM, Meta Audit – The Growth Folks® at 74/100 (some risk) — malware, permission and obfuscation checks combined. The full report lists every finding behind the number. This is an automated estimate, not a guarantee of safety.
What permissions does Pixel & Tag Checker: GA4, GTM, Meta Audit – The Growth Folks® require?
Pixel & Tag Checker: GA4, GTM, Meta Audit – The Growth Folks® requests 10 permissions. The most significant: Execute scripts in pages, Observe web requests, Access browser cookies. See the full breakdown in the security report.
Who develops Pixel & Tag Checker: GA4, GTM, Meta Audit – The Growth Folks®?
Pixel & Tag Checker: GA4, GTM, Meta Audit – The Growth Folks® is published by team. Impersonators copy popular extension names, so always verify the developer line and listing id on the store page before installing.
What this assessment covers
- Store listing
- Chrome
- Checked version
- 1.2.0
- Current listed version
- 1.2.0
- Scan date (UTC)
- Assessment status
- Completed
Recorded findings: 1 critical and 3 high severity. Read the finding details before interpreting the score; automated flags are not proof of malicious behaviour.
Automated analysis looks for suspicious code, permissions and other risk signals. It does not observe every runtime behaviour or independently audit the publisher’s servers. A low-risk result is not a guarantee of safety. How our checks work.