Chat Folders: ChatGPT Folders & Chat Organizer for Claude & Grok extension
Security at a glance
Automated estimate from our latest scan (malware, permissions, obfuscation) — not a security audit. Higher safety score is better.
See the full security reportChrome listing ID: ibiimiphefdnncjdaifgjolmegfmpojg
Permissions (2)
- Store local data
- Unlimited local storage
Related extensions
ChatFolders - Organize ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, GrokProductivity
Chat Folders for ChatGPT, Gemini & ClaudeProductivity
AI Chat Folders — Organize ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & GrokProductivity
Simple Folder: Organize your ChatGPT & ClaudeProductivity
Chat FoldersProductivity
Chat Folders for ClaudeProductivity
Frequently asked questions
Is Chat Folders: ChatGPT Folders & Chat Organizer for Claude & Grok safe to use?
Our latest automated scan rates the Chrome listing of Chat Folders: ChatGPT Folders & Chat Organizer for Claude & Grok at 90/100 (low risk) — malware, permission and obfuscation checks combined. The full report lists every finding behind the number. This is an automated estimate, not a guarantee of safety.
What permissions does Chat Folders: ChatGPT Folders & Chat Organizer for Claude & Grok require?
Chat Folders: ChatGPT Folders & Chat Organizer for Claude & Grok requests 2 permissions. The most significant: Store local data, Unlimited local storage. See the full breakdown in the security report.
Who develops Chat Folders: ChatGPT Folders & Chat Organizer for Claude & Grok?
Chat Folders: ChatGPT Folders & Chat Organizer for Claude & Grok is published by KnappSack Apps. Impersonators copy popular extension names, so always verify the developer line and listing id on the store page before installing.
What this assessment covers
- Store listing
- Chrome
- Checked version
- Not provided in this assessment
- Current listed version
- 1.1.9
- Assessment updated (UTC)
- Assessment status
- Completed
Recorded findings: 0 critical and 0 high severity. Read the finding details before interpreting the score; automated flags are not proof of malicious behaviour.
Automated analysis looks for suspicious code, permissions and other risk signals. It does not observe every runtime behaviour or independently audit the publisher’s servers. A low-risk result is not a guarantee of safety. How our checks work.