DiamChess – Free Game Review & Stockfish Analysis for Chess.com extension
Security at a glance
Automated estimate from our latest scan (malware, permissions, obfuscation) — not a security audit. Higher safety score is better.
See the full security reportChrome listing ID: bklobgjeobbgkflekjdndhpnadfekngn
Permissions (4)
- Store local data
- Create offscreen documents
- CPU info
Related extensions
Chess Compass - Free Unlimited Game Review for Chess.com & LichessLifestyle
Unlimited Free Chess.com AnalysisProductivity
SabioChess - Free Chess Analysis & Game ReviewTools
Chess Coach — Free Game Review for Chess.com and LichessTools
Chess Coach: Free Game Review & Stockfish AnalysisLifestyle
Free chess game review & analysis for Chess.com · what’sthispositionLifestyle
Frequently asked questions
Is DiamChess – Free Game Review & Stockfish Analysis for Chess.com safe to use?
Our latest automated scan rates the Chrome listing of DiamChess – Free Game Review & Stockfish Analysis for Chess.com at 82/100 (some risk) — malware, permission and obfuscation checks combined. The full report lists every finding behind the number. This is an automated estimate, not a guarantee of safety.
What permissions does DiamChess – Free Game Review & Stockfish Analysis for Chess.com require?
DiamChess – Free Game Review & Stockfish Analysis for Chess.com requests 4 permissions. The most significant: Store local data, Create offscreen documents, CPU info. See the full breakdown in the security report.
Who develops DiamChess – Free Game Review & Stockfish Analysis for Chess.com?
DiamChess – Free Game Review & Stockfish Analysis for Chess.com is published by maxime.sdp.pro. Impersonators copy popular extension names, so always verify the developer line and listing id on the store page before installing.
What this assessment covers
- Store listing
- Chrome
- Checked version
- 1.5.0
- Current listed version
- 1.5.0
- Scan date (UTC)
- Assessment status
- Completed
Recorded findings: 0 critical and 0 high severity. Read the finding details before interpreting the score; automated flags are not proof of malicious behaviour.
Automated analysis looks for suspicious code, permissions and other risk signals. It does not observe every runtime behaviour or independently audit the publisher’s servers. A low-risk result is not a guarantee of safety. How our checks work.