PitchWhip: Cold Call Script, Dialer + Phone & Email Finder for LinkedIn extension
Security at a glance
Automated estimate from our latest scan (malware, permissions, obfuscation) — not a security audit. Higher safety score is better.
See the full security reportChrome listing ID: delkpfhlhkcnjghhghfjjjhofkgjgjno
Permissions (5)
- Manage downloads
Related extensions
LeadCourt: Free B2B Email & Phone FinderProductivity
PitchPilotProductivity
InSpark - Phone & Email Finder | LinkedIn Automation ToolProductivity
LeadNear: Free Email FinderProductivity
Lead Magnet - Email Finder & lead generation for LinkedInProductivity
InPitch: Automate Connects & DMs for LinkedInLifestyle
Frequently asked questions
Is PitchWhip: Cold Call Script, Dialer + Phone & Email Finder for LinkedIn safe to use?
Our latest automated scan rates the Chrome listing of PitchWhip: Cold Call Script, Dialer + Phone & Email Finder for LinkedIn at 76/100 (some risk) — malware, permission and obfuscation checks combined. The full report lists every finding behind the number. This is an automated estimate, not a guarantee of safety.
What permissions does PitchWhip: Cold Call Script, Dialer + Phone & Email Finder for LinkedIn require?
PitchWhip: Cold Call Script, Dialer + Phone & Email Finder for LinkedIn requests 5 permissions. The most significant: Manage downloads. See the full breakdown in the security report.
Who develops PitchWhip: Cold Call Script, Dialer + Phone & Email Finder for LinkedIn?
PitchWhip: Cold Call Script, Dialer + Phone & Email Finder for LinkedIn is published by PitchWhip. Impersonators copy popular extension names, so always verify the developer line and listing id on the store page before installing.
What this assessment covers
- Store listing
- Chrome
- Checked version
- 15.0.7
- Current listed version
- 15.0.7
- Scan date (UTC)
- Assessment status
- Completed
Recorded findings: 0 critical and 1 high severity. Read the finding details before interpreting the score; automated flags are not proof of malicious behaviour.
Automated analysis looks for suspicious code, permissions and other risk signals. It does not observe every runtime behaviour or independently audit the publisher’s servers. A low-risk result is not a guarantee of safety. How our checks work.