SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
WordGloss
Firefox extension·by John
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
EXCELLENT
Looks clean. No meaningful risks detected in this scan.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
WordGloss's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
68%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 369,936 extensions
In Language Support
48%of language support extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 4,113 language support extensions
Findings
8
median 5Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
3
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
1
median 3vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 8 distinct issues across 6 severities
8
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical00%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium225%
Low675%
Info00%
Permissions requested
1 risky permission of 3 total
1 critical permission require attention
This extension requests 3 permissions in total. 1 of them grant broad capabilities that are worth a careful look.
Critical
Access to all websites
Can read and modify content on every website you visit
Medium
Custom menus
Can add custom items to the browser context menu
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Are you the author of WordGloss?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show WordGloss's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 25, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.