SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Friction Gate
Chrome extension·by Joshua Wang
90
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
EXCELLENT
Looks clean. No meaningful risks detected in this scan.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Friction Gate's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
64%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 409,539 extensions
In Lifestyle
67%of lifestyle extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 48,249 lifestyle extensions
Findings
8
median 12Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
3
median 1Declared in manifest
Active users
5
median 25vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 8 distinct issues across 6 severities
8
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical00%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium450%
Low450%
Info00%
Permissions requested
3 permissions declared
No risky permissions
3 permissions requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Block requests with host access
Can block or redirect network requests and requires host permissions
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Low
Schedule tasks
Can schedule periodic background tasks
Are you the author of Friction Gate?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Friction Gate's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 20, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.