SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
SentimentShield
Firefox extension·by kenzo
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
CRITICAL
Severe indicators. Treat as unsafe until the developer addresses these findings.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
SentimentShield's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
0%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 369,936 extensions
In Web Development
0%of web development extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 14,329 web development extensions
Findings
7
median 4Lower is safer
Critical findings
2
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
2
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
0
median 3vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 7 distinct issues across 6 severities
7
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical229%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium457%
Low114%
Info00%
Permissions requested
1 risky permission of 2 total
1 critical permission require attention
This extension requests 2 permissions in total. 1 of them grant broad capabilities that are worth a careful look.
Critical
Access to all websites
Can read and modify content on every website you visit
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Are you the author of SentimentShield?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show SentimentShield's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 24, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.