SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Typist
Chrome extension·by Dananz
94
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
EXCELLENT
Looks clean. No meaningful risks detected in this scan.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Typist's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
73%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 403,277 extensions
In Web Development
54%of web development extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 15,317 web development extensions
Findings
4
median 4Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
2
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
3
median 2vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 4 distinct issues across 6 severities
4
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical00%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium375%
Low125%
Info00%
Permissions requested
2 permissions declared
No risky permissions
2 permissions requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Medium
Access current tab
Can temporarily access the content of the active tab when you click the extension
Are you the author of Typist?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Typist's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 24, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.