SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
MapsReply – AI Review Replies
Chrome extension
83
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
CAUTION
Mostly fine, but a few things worth reviewing before you install.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
MapsReply – AI Review Replies's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
48%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 397,225 extensions
In Productivity
61%of productivity extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 191,248 productivity extensions
Findings
34
median 16Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
1
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
3
median 14vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 34 distinct issues across 6 severities
34
distinct issues
detected
detected
Scanners reported 40 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.
Critical00%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium39%
Low2574%
Info618%
Permissions requested
1 permission declared
No risky permissions
1 permission requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Are you the author of MapsReply – AI Review Replies?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show MapsReply – AI Review Replies's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 5, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.