SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
TextQ
Chrome extension·by Droidtown
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
EXCELLENT
Looks clean. No meaningful risks detected in this scan.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
TextQ's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
53%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 369,936 extensions
In Lifestyle
56%of lifestyle extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 43,972 lifestyle extensions
Findings
12
median 12Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
3
median 1Declared in manifest
Active users
12
median 26vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 12 distinct issues across 6 severities
12
distinct issues
detected
detected
Scanners reported 22 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.
Critical00%
High18%
Needs Review00%
Medium867%
Low325%
Info00%
Permissions requested
2 risky permissions of 3 total
2 high-risk permissions require attention
This extension requests 3 permissions in total. 2 of them grant broad capabilities that are worth a careful look.
High
Execute scripts in pages
Can inject and execute JavaScript code in web pages
High
View open tabs
Can see URLs and titles of all open tabs
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Are you the author of TextQ?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show TextQ's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 17, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.