SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
88pdf
Chrome extension·by metallicpen
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
88pdf's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
2%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 369,936 extensions
In Productivity
2%of productivity extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 177,133 productivity extensions
Findings
121
median 16Lower is safer
Critical findings
2
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
5
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
1
median 14vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 121 distinct issues across 6 severities
121
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical22%
High3226%
Needs Review00%
Medium7058%
Low119%
Info65%
Permissions requested
1 risky permission of 5 total
1 high-risk permission require attention
This extension requests 5 permissions in total. 1 of them grant broad capabilities that are worth a careful look.
High
View open tabs
Can see URLs and titles of all open tabs
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Low
Use side panel
Can display content in the browser side panel
Low
Create offscreen documents
Can create hidden documents for background processing tasks
Low
Block network requests (declarative)
Can block or redirect network requests using predefined rules without seeing content
Are you the author of 88pdf?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show 88pdf's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 4, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.