SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Names for Articles
Chrome extension·by because_curious
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
EXCELLENT
Looks clean. No meaningful risks detected in this scan.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Names for Articles's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
61%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 120,731 extensions
In Productivity
83%of productivity extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 25,973 productivity extensions
Findings
3
median 10Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
1
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
28
median 23vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 3 findings across 5 severities
3
findings
detected
detected
Critical00%
High133%
Medium133%
Low133%
Info00%
Permissions requested
1 risky permission of 1 total
1 high-risk permission require attention
This extension requests 1 permission in total. 1 of them grant broad capabilities that are worth a careful look.
High
Manage downloads
Can initiate downloads and access your download history
Are you the author of Names for Articles?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Jun 25, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.