SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Linkder
Chrome extension·by GTM minute
52
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Abandonedsafety score reduced by 40 points
- No update in over 4 years
- The developer's website is no longer reachable
- Bundles libraries with known vulnerabilities and no fix in sight
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Linkder's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
68%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 409,596 extensions
In Productivity
82%of productivity extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 198,328 productivity extensions
Findings
8
median 16Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
1
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
149
median 13vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 8 distinct issues across 6 severities
8
distinct issues
detected
detected
Scanners reported 16 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.
Critical00%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium338%
Low450%
Info113%
Permissions requested
1 permission declared
No risky permissions
1 permission requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Are you the author of Linkder?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Linkder's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 23, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.