SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
CPVcodex
Chrome extension·by Carlos Geadas
54
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 5 years
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
CPVcodex's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
52%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 402,636 extensions
In Productivity
65%of productivity extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 194,442 productivity extensions
Findings
28
median 16Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
2
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
4
median 14vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 28 distinct issues across 6 severities
28
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical00%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium2796%
Low14%
Info00%
Permissions requested
2 permissions declared
No risky permissions
2 permissions requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Add context menu items
Can add custom items to the right-click context menu
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Are you the author of CPVcodex?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show CPVcodex's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 4, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.