SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Fact vs Opinion Highlighter
Firefox extension·by Frederick Harrison
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
EXCELLENT
Looks clean. No meaningful risks detected in this scan.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Fact vs Opinion Highlighter's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
93.29%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked across every extension we scan
In its category
83.29%of its category extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked within its category
Findings
5
median 38Lower is safer
Risky permissions
1
median 1Critical + high perms
Total permissions
3
median 4All declared perms
Critical findings
0
median 2Severity = Critical
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 5 findings across 5 severities
5
findings
detected
detected
Critical00%
High00%
Medium360%
Low240%
Info00%
Permissions requested
1 risky permission of 3 total
1 critical permission require attention
This extension requests 3 permissions in total. 1 of them grant broad capabilities that are worth a careful look.
Critical
Access to all websites
Can read and modify content on every website you visit
Medium
Access current tab
Can temporarily access the content of the active tab when you click the extension
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Are you the author of Fact vs Opinion Highlighter?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Jun 25, 2026· partial run (some scanners failed)
Browser extensions made transparent.