SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Cepter
Chrome extension·by ayal gelles
61
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Cepter's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
6%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 402,748 extensions
In Productivity
8%of productivity extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 194,452 productivity extensions
Findings
61
median 16Lower is safer
Critical findings
1
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
2
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
102
median 14vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 61 distinct issues across 6 severities
61
distinct issues
detected
detected
Scanners reported 79 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.
Critical12%
High915%
Needs Review00%
Medium3862%
Low1220%
Info12%
Permissions requested
1 risky permission of 2 total
1 critical permission require attention
This extension requests 2 permissions in total. 1 of them grant broad capabilities that are worth a careful look.
Critical
Browser debugger access
Can attach to tabs and inspect/modify all page data using Chrome DevTools protocol
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Are you the author of Cepter?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Cepter's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 13, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.