Free VPN with bypass of locks — Pipster proxy extension
Security at a glance
Describes the Chrome listing; other stores are scanned separately and can score differently. Automated estimate from our latest scan (malware, permissions, obfuscation) — not a security audit. Higher safety score is better.
See the full security reportChrome listing ID: pjjjdhmjcocbljdojhonknpfdajfncap
Permissions (6)
- Manage other extensions
- Control proxy settings
- Observe web requests
Related extensions
VPN Unlimited - VPN Proxy for FirefoxPrivacy & Security
VPNSocial & Communication
VPN Free - Betternet VPN ProxyPrivacy & Security
Free Proxy VPN| IP Unblock| Unblock WebsitesPrivacy & SecurityFree VPN Proxy & Unblock – SecurePaid VPNPrivacy & Security
Free VPN with bypass of locks — Pipster proxyMake Chrome Yours
Frequently asked questions
Is Free VPN with bypass of locks — Pipster proxy safe to use?
Our latest automated scan rates the Chrome listing of Free VPN with bypass of locks — Pipster proxy at 74/100 (some risk) — malware, permission and obfuscation checks combined. The full report lists every finding behind the number. This is an automated estimate, not a guarantee of safety.
What permissions does Free VPN with bypass of locks — Pipster proxy require?
Free VPN with bypass of locks — Pipster proxy requests 6 permissions. The most significant: Manage other extensions, Control proxy settings, Observe web requests. See the full breakdown in the security report.
Who develops Free VPN with bypass of locks — Pipster proxy?
Free VPN with bypass of locks — Pipster proxy is published by PROMDEVELOPMENT, OOO. Impersonators copy popular extension names, so always verify the developer line and listing id on the store page before installing.
What this assessment covers
- Store listing
- Chrome
- Checked version
- 1.0.16
- Current listed version
- 1.0.16
- Scan date (UTC)
- Assessment status
- Completed
Recorded findings: 2 critical and 6 high severity. Read the finding details before interpreting the score; automated flags are not proof of malicious behaviour.
Automated analysis looks for suspicious code, permissions and other risk signals. It does not observe every runtime behaviour or independently audit the publisher’s servers. A low-risk result is not a guarantee of safety. How our checks work.