SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Monosearch
Chrome extension·by inbayse
62
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Monosearch's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
3%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 421,529 extensions
In Lifestyle
3%of lifestyle extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 49,942 lifestyle extensions
Findings
2013
median 14Lower is safer
Critical findings
3
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
3
median 2Declared in manifest
Active users
40000
median 24vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 2,013 distinct issues across 6 severities
2,013
distinct issues
detected
detected
1 square ≈ 5 issues
Scanners reported 2,014 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.
Critical30%
High774%
Needs Review00%
Medium1,86292%
Low603%
Info111%
Permissions requested
3 permissions declared
No risky permissions
3 permissions requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Add context menu items
Can add custom items to the right-click context menu
Medium
Show notifications
Can display desktop notifications outside the browser
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Are you the author of Monosearch?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Monosearch's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Oct 26, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.