SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
ReplyMore
Chrome extension·by samyrahim07
58
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
ReplyMore's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
4%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 409,539 extensions
In Productivity
5%of productivity extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 198,326 productivity extensions
Findings
22
median 16Lower is safer
Critical findings
1
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
3
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
27
median 14vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 22 distinct issues across 6 severities
22
distinct issues
detected
detected
Scanners reported 24 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.
Critical15%
High15%
Needs Review00%
Medium1255%
Low732%
Info15%
Permissions requested
3 permissions declared
No risky permissions
3 permissions requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Info
https://*.twitter.com/*
No additional information available.
Info
https://*.x.com/*
No additional information available.
Are you the author of ReplyMore?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show ReplyMore's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 12, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.