SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
we were online
Chrome extension·by spencerc99
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
EXCELLENT
Looks clean. No meaningful risks detected in this scan.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
we were online's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
92.36%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked across every extension we scan
In its category
82.36%of its category extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked within its category
Findings
10
median 38Lower is safer
Risky permissions
1
median 1Critical + high perms
Total permissions
5
median 4All declared perms
Critical findings
0
median 2Severity = Critical
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 10 distinct issues across 6 severities
10
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical00%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium220%
Low770%
Info110%
Permissions requested
1 risky permission of 5 total
1 high-risk permission require attention
This extension requests 5 permissions in total. 1 of them grant broad capabilities that are worth a careful look.
High
View open tabs
Can see URLs and titles of all open tabs
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Medium
Unlimited local storage
Can store large amounts of data locally without size limits
Low
Schedule tasks
Can schedule periodic background tasks
Low
Detect idle state
Can detect when your machine is idle, active, or locked
Are you the author of we were online?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show we were online's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Jul 25, 2026· partial run (some scanners failed)
Browser extensions made transparent.