SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Curious George
Chrome extension·by Daniel Ajayi
63
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 5 years
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Curious George's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
71%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 415,509 extensions
In Lifestyle
73%of lifestyle extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 49,065 lifestyle extensions
Findings
6
median 13Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
1
median 1Declared in manifest
Active users
26
median 25vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 6 distinct issues across 6 severities
6
distinct issues
detected
detected
Scanners reported 14 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.
Critical00%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium467%
Low233%
Info00%
Permissions requested
1 permission declared
No risky permissions
1 permission requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Are you the author of Curious George?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Curious George's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 13, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.