SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
DailyQ - Coding Practice
Chrome extension·by nimrod.a6
85
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
EXCELLENT
Looks clean. No meaningful risks detected in this scan.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
DailyQ - Coding Practice's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
55%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 403,277 extensions
In Productivity
68%of productivity extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 194,471 productivity extensions
Findings
11
median 16Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
1
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
31
median 14vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 11 distinct issues across 6 severities
11
distinct issues
detected
detected
Scanners reported 16 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.
Critical00%
High218%
Needs Review00%
Medium655%
Low327%
Info00%
Permissions requested
1 permission declared
No risky permissions
1 permission requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Are you the author of DailyQ - Coding Practice?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show DailyQ - Coding Practice's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 14, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.