SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Jumpstick
Chrome extension·by aaron
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Jumpstick's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
6%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 369,936 extensions
In Lifestyle
7%of lifestyle extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 43,972 lifestyle extensions
Findings
28
median 12Lower is safer
Critical findings
1
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
3
median 1Declared in manifest
Active users
173
median 26vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 28 distinct issues across 6 severities
28
distinct issues
detected
detected
Scanners reported 38 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.
Critical14%
High518%
Needs Review00%
Medium1864%
Low311%
Info14%
Permissions requested
1 risky permission of 3 total
1 high-risk permission require attention
This extension requests 3 permissions in total. 1 of them grant broad capabilities that are worth a careful look.
High
Access browser cookies
Can read and modify cookies, potentially accessing login sessions
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Low
Run in background
Can run scripts in the background when not actively in use
Are you the author of Jumpstick?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Jumpstick's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 8, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.