SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Scrolantana
Firefox extension·by disklosr
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
CAUTION
Mostly fine, but a few things worth reviewing before you install.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 7 years
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Scrolantana's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
82%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 369,936 extensions
In Appearance
56%of appearance extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 17,915 appearance extensions
Findings
3
median 3Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
2
median 2Declared in manifest
Active users
30
median 3vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 3 distinct issues across 6 severities
3
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical00%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium133%
Low267%
Info00%
Permissions requested
2 risky permissions of 2 total
2 high-risk permissions require attention
This extension requests 2 permissions in total. 2 of them grant broad capabilities that are worth a careful look.
High
Access all HTTP sites
Can read and modify content on all non-encrypted websites
High
Access all HTTPS sites
Can read and modify content on all encrypted websites
Are you the author of Scrolantana?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Scrolantana's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 24, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.