SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Code Interview
Chrome extension·by Code Interview
45
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 7 years
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Code Interview's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
25%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 403,277 extensions
In Other
8%of other extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 28,735 other extensions
Findings
26
median 3Lower is safer
Critical findings
3
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
0
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
116
median 2vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 26 distinct issues across 6 severities
26
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical312%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium1869%
Low519%
Info00%
Permissions requested
0 permissions declared
No permissions requested
This extension doesn't request any browser permissions. That's unusually clean.
Are you the author of Code Interview?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Code Interview's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 1, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.