SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
gToDos
Firefox extension·by Khoi Le
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 6 years
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
gToDos's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
67%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 369,936 extensions
In Other
32%of other extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 26,888 other extensions
Findings
5
median 3Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
0
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
0
median 2vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 5 distinct issues across 6 severities
5
distinct issues
detected
detected
Scanners reported 7 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.
Critical00%
High120%
Needs Review00%
Medium360%
Low120%
Info00%
Permissions requested
0 permissions declared
No permissions requested
This extension doesn't request any browser permissions. That's unusually clean.
Are you the author of gToDos?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show gToDos's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 9, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.