SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
gata
Chrome extension·by Evan Salter
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 6 years
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
gata's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
58%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 370,281 extensions
In Search Tools
28%of search tools extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 15,413 search tools extensions
Findings
11
median 4Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
1
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
17
median 2vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 11 distinct issues across 6 severities
11
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical00%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium764%
Low218%
Info218%
Permissions requested
1 permission declared
No risky permissions
1 permission requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Are you the author of gata?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show gata's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 7, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.