SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
GDork
Firefox extension·by SI9INT
63
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 6 years
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
GDork's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
70%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 397,380 extensions
In Privacy & Security
56%of privacy & security extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 12,476 privacy & security extensions
Findings
5
median 5Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
2
median 4Declared in manifest
Active users
1
median 3vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 5 distinct issues across 6 severities
5
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical00%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium480%
Low120%
Info00%
Permissions requested
2 permissions declared
No risky permissions
2 permissions requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Info
*://*/*
No additional information available.
Are you the author of GDork?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show GDork's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 8, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.