SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
DID-SIOP
Firefox extension·by Radical Ledger
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
CRITICAL
Severe indicators. Treat as unsafe until the developer addresses these findings.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 6 years
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
DID-SIOP's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
2%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 369,936 extensions
In Other
1%of other extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 26,888 other extensions
Findings
68
median 3Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
1
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
1
median 2vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 68 distinct issues across 6 severities
68
distinct issues
detected
detected
Scanners reported 98 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.
Critical00%
High1928%
Needs Review00%
Medium2537%
Low1218%
Info1218%
Permissions requested
1 risky permission of 1 total
1 critical permission require attention
This extension requests 1 permission in total. 1 of them grant broad capabilities that are worth a careful look.
Critical
Access to all websites
Can read and modify content on every website you visit
Are you the author of DID-SIOP?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show DID-SIOP's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 4, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.