SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Zipper
Chrome extension·by RealrecordzLab
50
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 5 years
- The developer's website is no longer reachable
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Zipper's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
39%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 409,539 extensions
In Games Entertainment
16%of games entertainment extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 9,537 games entertainment extensions
Findings
16
median 4Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
0
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
61
median 4vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 16 distinct issues across 6 severities
16
distinct issues
detected
detected
Scanners reported 17 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.
Critical00%
High213%
Needs Review00%
Medium956%
Low16%
Info425%
Permissions requested
0 permissions declared
No permissions requested
This extension doesn't request any browser permissions. That's unusually clean.
Are you the author of Zipper?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Zipper's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 7, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.