SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Fire-Sticky
Firefox extension·by Francesco De Stefano
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 5 years
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Fire-Sticky's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
28%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 369,936 extensions
In Alerts & Updates
11%of alerts & updates extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 6,603 alerts & updates extensions
Findings
15
median 4Lower is safer
Critical findings
1
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
3
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
14
median 2vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 15 distinct issues across 6 severities
15
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical17%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium1387%
Low17%
Info00%
Permissions requested
3 permissions declared
No risky permissions
3 permissions requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Medium
Add context menu items
Can add custom items to the right-click context menu
Medium
Unlimited local storage
Can store large amounts of data locally without size limits
Are you the author of Fire-Sticky?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Fire-Sticky's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 7, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.