SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Symbols Name
Firefox extension·by Sumit Patil
63
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 5 years
- Bundles libraries with known vulnerabilities and no fix in sight
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Symbols Name's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
72%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 409,539 extensions
In Games Entertainment
45%of games entertainment extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 9,537 games entertainment extensions
Findings
6
median 4Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
0
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
2
median 4vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 6 distinct issues across 6 severities
6
distinct issues
detected
detected
Scanners reported 13 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.
Critical00%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium467%
Low233%
Info00%
Permissions requested
0 permissions declared
No permissions requested
This extension doesn't request any browser permissions. That's unusually clean.
Are you the author of Symbols Name?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Symbols Name's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 24, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.