SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
BMJO
Firefox extension·by Wali Shahram
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 5 years
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
BMJO's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
59.94%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked across every extension we scan
In its category
49.94%of its category extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked within its category
Findings
7
median 38Lower is safer
Risky permissions
0
median 1Critical + high perms
Total permissions
0
median 4All declared perms
Critical findings
0
median 2Severity = Critical
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 7 distinct issues across 6 severities
7
distinct issues
detected
detected
Scanners reported 9 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.
Critical00%
High229%
Needs Review00%
Medium343%
Low229%
Info00%
Permissions requested
0 permissions declared
No permissions requested
This extension doesn't request any browser permissions. That's unusually clean.
Are you the author of BMJO?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show BMJO's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Jul 25, 2026· partial run (some scanners failed)
Browser extensions made transparent.