SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
eninclusif — dico inclusif
Firefox extension·by Leersie
67
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
CAUTION
Mostly fine, but a few things worth reviewing before you install.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 5 years
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
eninclusif — dico inclusif's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
85%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 397,380 extensions
In Social & Communication
72%of social & communication extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 13,617 social & communication extensions
Findings
2
median 5Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
0
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
13
median 3vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 2 distinct issues across 6 severities
2
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical00%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium150%
Low150%
Info00%
Permissions requested
0 permissions declared
No permissions requested
This extension doesn't request any browser permissions. That's unusually clean.
Are you the author of eninclusif — dico inclusif?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show eninclusif — dico inclusif's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 6, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.