SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Days Without Overflow
Firefox extension·by peterg
63
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 5 years
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Days Without Overflow's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
71%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 409,539 extensions
In Web Development
49%of web development extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 15,317 web development extensions
Findings
4
median 4Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
1
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
1
median 2vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 4 distinct issues across 6 severities
4
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical00%
High125%
Needs Review00%
Medium250%
Low125%
Info00%
Permissions requested
1 risky permission of 1 total
1 high-risk permission require attention
This extension requests 1 permission in total. 1 of them grant broad capabilities that are worth a careful look.
High
Access browsing history
Can read and modify your complete browsing history
Are you the author of Days Without Overflow?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Days Without Overflow's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 3, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.