SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Viziter
Chrome extension·by Eray Koschell
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 5 years
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Viziter's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
45%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 369,936 extensions
In Tabs
23%of tabs extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 11,722 tabs extensions
Findings
4
median 4Lower is safer
Critical findings
1
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
1
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
40
median 3vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 4 distinct issues across 6 severities
4
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical125%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium250%
Low125%
Info00%
Permissions requested
1 permission declared
No risky permissions
1 permission requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Are you the author of Viziter?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Viziter's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 25, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.