SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
ChanScan
Firefox extension·by Jake Creps
48
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
RISKY
Several elevated signals. Read the findings before sharing this with your team.
Likely abandonedsafety score reduced by 30 points
- No update in over 5 years
- The developer's website is no longer reachable
Why this matters
An unmaintained extension keeps whatever flaws it shipped with, and a listing with users but no owner is an attractive target to buy and repurpose.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
ChanScan's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
33%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 415,560 extensions
In Search Tools
16%of search tools extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 16,729 search tools extensions
Findings
10
median 5Lower is safer
Critical findings
1
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
2
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
2
median 2vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 10 distinct issues across 6 severities
10
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical110%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium880%
Low110%
Info00%
Permissions requested
2 permissions declared
No risky permissions
2 permissions requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Info
*://*/*
No additional information available.
Are you the author of ChanScan?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show ChanScan's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 1, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.