SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN
Imgur, but for Image Hosting
Firefox extension·by fi-le
0
/ 100 SAFETY SCORE
EXCELLENT
Looks clean. No meaningful risks detected in this scan.
Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue
How it ranks
Imgur, but for Image Hosting's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned
Globally
79%of extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 369,936 extensions
In Social & Communication
62%of social & communication extensions carry more risk
Riskier ←→ Safer
Ranked against 12,741 social & communication extensions
Findings
3
median 4Lower is safer
Critical findings
0
median 0Severity = Critical
Permissions
2
median 3Declared in manifest
Active users
9
median 3vs category median
Findings breakdown
Automated security signal · 3 distinct issues across 6 severities
3
distinct issues
detected
detected
Critical00%
High00%
Needs Review00%
Medium267%
Low133%
Info00%
Permissions requested
2 permissions declared
No risky permissions
2 permissions requested — none are flagged as risky.
Medium
Store local data
Can save data locally in the browser for persistence
Info
*://*.imgur.com/gallery/*
No additional information available.
Are you the author of Imgur, but for Image Hosting?
Claim this extension to respond to findings, add context, and earn a verified badge on extenshi.io.
Add the badge to your README
Show Imgur, but for Image Hosting's live security score on GitHub or in your docs
Scan performed by extenshi.io · Aug 12, 2026
Browser extensions made transparent.