SECURITY REPORT · EXTENSHI SCAN

JournalLens

Firefox extension·by Omid Beiki

/ 100 SAFETY SCORE

EXCELLENT

Looks clean. No meaningful risks detected in this scan.

Automated analysis of publicly available code — not a professional security audit. It may produce false positives and does not prove an extension is unsafe or safe. Treat it as one signal among many. Disclaimer · Report an issue

How it ranks

JournalLens's safety score vs every other extension we've scanned

Globally

92.45%of extensions carry more risk

This extension

Riskier ←→ Safer

Ranked across every extension we scan

In its category

82.45%of its category extensions carry more risk

This extension

Riskier ←→ Safer

Ranked within its category

Findings

median 38Lower is safer

Risky permissions

median 1Critical + high perms

Total permissions

median 4All declared perms

Critical findings

median 2Severity = Critical

Findings breakdown

Automated security signal · 6 distinct issues across 6 severities

distinct issues
detected

Scanners reported 10 raw occurrences; repeats of the same issue at the same location are merged here. The list below shows every occurrence.

Critical00%

High00%

Needs Review00%

Medium350%

Low350%

Info00%

Permissions requested

1 risky permission of 80 total

1 high-risk permission require attention

This extension requests 80 permissions in total. 1 of them grant broad capabilities that are worth a careful look.

High

Execute scripts in pages

Can inject and execute JavaScript code in web pages

Medium

Store local data

Can save data locally in the browser for persistence

Medium